Mennonite Weekly Review LogoMennonite Weekly Review

Last updated November 24.

May 18, 2009 issue

‘Not in my name’ — and the next step

Folk singer John McCutcheon, a favorite of Mennonite audiences, wrote a song in 2001 called “Not in My Name.” It’s not outdated yet.

“You see the plane in the distance / You see the flame in the sky / See the young ones running for cover / See the old ones wondering why / They tell us the world is a dangerous place / We live in a terrible time / But in Hiroshima, New York or Baghdad / It’s the innocent who pay for the crime.”

The chorus repeats: “Not in my name.”

Those words are still a peacemaker’s plea after the latest awful mistake in a war with America’s name on it.

In western Afghanistan on May 5, believing they had Taliban fighters in their sights, U.S. commanders ordered airstrikes on three villages. The Afghan army had been fighting the Taliban nearby. But by the time the bombs fell, witnesses said, the Taliban were gone. The poor farmers’ mud-brick houses in the villages of Gerani, Gangabad and Koujaha offered little protection. The attacks killed as many as 147 civilians, local officials said. U.S. officials acknowledged some deaths but said the Afghan claim was exaggerated. Women and children were among the dead and wounded. U.S. defense secretary Robert Gates expressed regret.

Horrors like these make Christian peacemakers want to shout, “Not in our name.” But how?

One way is to raise the voice of the church together. In April, Central Plains Mennonite Conference sent to President Obama two resolutions it passed last June calling for an end to the war in Iraq and a halt to U.S. military aid that fuels Colombia’s civil war. Conference leaders added a letter asking the president not to expand the war in Afghanistan.

By stating our disapproval, we say “not in my name.” But is that enough? Why stop with a negative word? Next should come something with even more impact: positive action.

This is where the ministry of Christian Peacemaker Teams comes in. Few of us will go to Iraq or Colombia — or to Congo or Palestine (where U.S. support for Israel makes Israeli actions virtually “in our name” too). But CPT workers serve in all those places and others. Walking with those who suffer, they show the peaceful face of Christianity. That’s in contrast to the violence that too often gets identified with both our nation and its dominant faith.

Today CPT, like many church-related programs, confronts a financial challenge. Unless donations rebound from last year’s 9 percent decline, the organization may need to scale back or suspend some of its work in Iraq, Colombia, Congo and Palestine.

“Must we postpone support for those called to full-time peacemaking while the rest of the world continues to provide financial support for people entering armed groups?” asks CPT co-director Carol Rose.

For 25 years, CPT has based its work on the premise that just as soldiers risk their lives in war, nonviolent Christians should face danger for peace. That powerful idea has grown into an essential ministry of the historic peace churches — Mennonites, Quakers and Brethren — along with like-minded members of other denominations.

Distancing ourselves from war takes just a few words. Aligning ourselves with peace takes positive action. Those who do that in our name need more support now.

Paul Schrag

Comments

  • Yes it is very sad that 147 civilians were accidently killed by US military forces as you indicated. God, in his wisdom, has ordained governments to confront criminals and terrorist people. In the process of confrontation, innocents are unfortunately killed.

    If MC USA is really serious about areas of global conflict, perhaps they should consider a mandatory draft of all men and women ages 18-25 years of age for service in Christian Peacemaker Teams and send them to all the global hot spots. There are also hot spots in the US. I speak about all the abortion clinics in the US where, each day on an average, 3000 living, innocent infants in the womb are violently destroyed, not by US military, but by professional civilians. If Mennonite churches are concerned about the 147 deaths of innocents by the US military, why are not MC USA churches also concerned about protecting the living and innocent unborn? I am hoping the 'Not In My Name' effort can also be extended to protecting the lives of the unborn who are presently on death row.

    - A. Dale Welty (may 17 at 4:50 p.m.)

Comment on the article ‘Not in my name’ — and the next step

The purpose of comments is to engage in dialogue. We expect commenters to treat authors and each other as each would want to be treated. Respectful criticism is welcomed; offensive comments or parts of comments will be removed by the site administrator. Name and comment will be posted; email address is for follow-up only and will not be made public.

  • HTML tags are not permitted in comments and will be removed. Markdown syntax may be used for emphasis, blockquotes and links.

MWR Classifieds

Job listings and other offerings

This Week’s Front Page

image of Feb. 6 front page Download a PDF version of page one of MWR's Feb. 6 print edition.

© 1999-2010, Mennonite Weekly Review Inc. | All rights reserved.

129 W 6th St Newton KS 67114 | 800-424-0178 | For reprints, write editor (at) mennoweekly.org

Made with Django. thanks to dirt circle. icons by famfamfam.

Loading