Mennonite Weekly Review

Scarcely a week goes by without someone saying, “Give people fish and you feed them for a day; teach them how to fish and you feed them for life.”

It’s a handy slogan, and ever since Chinese philosopher K’uan-Tzu came up with it 2,500 years ago it has neatly expressed a core truth about giving help that lasts. He understood how short-term handouts relate to long-term impact.

Christians can relate to the image. The disciples caught fish; Jesus employed fish in powerful metaphors that endure.

Like any good phrase, however, it has been overused. It also glosses over the complexity of today’s poverty.

Maybe it’s time for an update.

Are fishing lessons what the poor need most? Chances are, they already know how to fish, maybe better than we do, but they lack other necessities to make it happen. Besides, not everyone fishes the way we do. Using bamboo baskets to catch red snapper off the coast of Haiti is different than angling for trout in Manitoba. Before we head out to teach, we have to be sure we actually possess the skill they need.

Maybe what they really need is better equipment. But how to get it? The banks probably won’t lend them money because the poor may not have collateral or credit history. There’s the local loan shark, but who wants to pay 250 percent interest? Perhaps what they need is affordable credit so they can purchase the items on their own.

So now they have the right fishing tackle. Can they gather by the river? “Whoever owns the pond decides who gets the fish,” says African-American minister John Perkins. No matter how well they can fish, they’ll stay poor if they can’t get access to the water. In order to feed themselves for life, they may need help getting fishing rights. That complicates things. Maybe the help they need has less to do with imparting a skill than pressing for larger issues of justice.

Let’s say the poor have managed to arrange a spot on the river, but a factory upstream (perhaps owned by corporations in which our pensions are invested) is dumping effluent that contaminates the river. Poisoned fish can’t be sold or fed to the family. To really help the poor we may have to help them achieve better environmental standards. Or, at the very least, urge corporations who do business there to behave themselves and not make messes that keep people poor.

OK, let’s assume our fisherfolk have overcome all these obstacles. They know how to fish. They’ve obtained credit at a decent price to buy equipment. They’ve gained access to the river. The water is clean, and the fish are edible.